Skip to main content

Makhana wants an MSP

 

In today’s EDSOURCE, we tell you why Bihar’s government thinks that makhana should be covered under MSP.                                                                                                                                                  

The Story

In 2022, the government awarded a geographical indication (GI) tag to makhana - a product from Bihar’s Mithila region. For the uninitiated, makhana or fox nut is the humble seed of the water lily plant, and has been a staple in Bihar for years. And a GI tag is a certification given to a product to attribute it to a certain location, like Kashmiri Saffron or Dharwad Pedas. This helps prevent others from selling their products as the real deal.

In makhana’s case, the GI tag might have helped push raw makhana prices up by 10 times since 2012, now hitting around ₹800 per kilo. Its popularity soared, especially during the pandemic, when healthy snacking became all the rage in India and abroad, where they could even fetch up to ₹13,000 per kilo.

In India, the makhana industry is booming, currently worth a whopping ₹3,000 crores, and it’s expected to more than double in the next 2-3 years. Snack industry players are dubbing it a superfood and getting creative with flavoured munchies and even makhana pasta to replace junk food. Just the flavoured makhana snack market alone is worth ₹150 crores and is growing at about 30% each year. And that might seem like the makhana industry is rolling in profits.

But that’s only part of the story because Bihar’s government is actually urging the central government to set an MSP (Minimum Support Price) for the crop. And if you’ve been reading us for a while, you know MSP is the price at which the government agrees to buy farmers’ crops if no one else does, protecting them from market price swings and big losses.

So yeah, it’s come to that for makhana now. How’s that, you ask?

Before makhana, farmers in Bihar mainly grew crops like corn and rice, but these weren’t very profitable. Weather uncertainties and recurrent flooding often ruined the crop.

Enter makhana — a crop perfectly suited for Bihar’s climate, transforming it into a cash crop. Bihar became the heart of makhana production, churning out around 10,000 tonnes annually. And this now means that over 80% of India’s makhana comes from Bihar, providing a livelihood for farmers across 10 districts.

But here’s the catch. Makhana isn’t exactly a high-yield crop. Between July and October, farmers in Bihar’s makhana-growing areas navigate thorny leaves and dive into murky ponds to gather the seeds of the water lily plant. These seeds are then dried, manually processed under high heat and popped (like popcorn). And despite all the hard work, not all seeds turn into edible makhana. To put things into perspective, only about 40% of the original haul makes it to the market.

Now, you might think that scarce output would drive up the per kilo prices, but it actually lowers overall income for farmers. Their earnings are often outweighed by their investments, leaving them in debt and needing to produce more to make ends meet.

That's not to say they haven't tried reversing their fortunes.

For starters, in 2015, research led to the development of a new makhana variety called ‘Sabour Makhana-1’, which doubled crop yields and increased the output of edible makhana to nearly 60%. This variety was available under a government scheme at a 75% subsidy. So, if a farmer spends ₹97,000 to cultivate makhana on one hectare of land area, they’d only have to pay about ₹24,000.

And the proof is in the pudding. These benefits have expanded the makhana cultivation area by nearly 170%, reaching 35,000 hectares over the last decade.

But the real issue lies in how farmers sell their produce.

See, the wholesale market for makhana is unorganised. So, farmers often end up selling to middlemen at low prices, who then sell to companies at double the price. These middlemen know that makhana is in high demand, marketed as a healthy snack and a vegan protein source. And they exploit the farmers who can’t afford to store their produce until market conditions are favourable. Middlemen stock up, create artificial scarcity and profit while farmers struggle.

An unorganised market also often breeds misinformation. For instance, in 2021, a price crash was blamed on surplus production. But the increasing use of makhana in the snack market suggests otherwise. This hints at traders possibly cheating farmers with incorrect information to make money off their plight.

Add to the fact that makhana is manually processed, leading to unevenly sized popped seeds. So, a significant portion of it gets rejected for export. For context, only about 2% or 200 tonnes of the makhana produced in India are exported annually. And this gives traders another excuse to bargain for lower prices from farmers while still selling high to local companies.

Sure, bringing in machines could help grade makhana by size, but farmers fear job losses and further exploitation by profit-driven companies.

And that’s exactly why the state government believes that makhana deserves an MSP. It could protect its farmers from exploitation and price fluctuations.

However, MSP might not be the perfect solution since only about 6% of farmers benefit from it. At least that’s what media reports suggest. Even if that’s a poor estimate, other figures peg it at 15%-25%. And that still doesn’t seem like much.

So, perhaps the real fix is streamlining the supply chain and connecting farmers directly with companies that add more retail value to makhana. This could address farmers’ issues and save the central government from the burden of spending more on buying crops under MSP.

But we’ll only have to wait and see how the central and state governments come to grips with the matter.

Until then...

Don't forget to share this story on WhatsApp, LinkedIn and X.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Panchayat Season 4 Cast Fees: Jitendra Kumar, who plays Abhishek Tripathi, is the highest-paid actor of the season. Reportedly, he charged Rs 70,000 per episode.

Panchayat Season 4 Cast Fees:  Panchayat is one of the most popular web series, which recently returned with its fourth season. Starring Jitendra Kumar, Neena Gupta, Raghubir Yadav, Faisal Malik, Chandan Roy, Sanvikaa, Durgesh Kumar, Sunita Rajwar and Pankaj Jha in the lead, the show enjoys a massive fan following. But do you know how much each of these actors earned per episode of  Panchayat ? If a recent report by NDTV is to be believed, Jitendra Kumar, who plays the sachiv of Phulera, Abhishek Tripathi, is the highest-paid actor of the season. Reportedly, he charged Rs 70,000 per episode. He is followed by Neena Gupta, who was reportedly paid Rs 50,000 per episode. Raghubir Yadav, who has become a household name as Pradhan ji, reportedly received Rs 40,000 per episode of the show. On the other hand, Chandan Roy aks Vikas earned a total of Rs 1,60,000 from Panchayat season 4. Meanwhile, talking about Panchayat 4, the season picks up in Phulera as two strong-heade...

Is India’s stock market riding too high?

In today’s Edsource, we talk about the CAPE ratio and whether it is a reliable metric for predicting stock market crashes. The Story Let’s talk about stock market crashes. Even if you haven’t lived through one, you must have definitely heard or read about the big ones: the dot-com bubble in 2000 or the global financial crisis of 2008. Those events rocked the global economy, wiping out wealth and destabilising markets for years. But behind these crashes lies something that’s often mentioned in the financial world: the Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings (CAPE) ratio, also known as Shiller’s P/E. You see, back in 2000, right before the tech bubble burst, the CAPE ratio for the U.S. stock market hit a record high. It peaked again in 2007, right before the global financial crisis struck. So, why are we talking about it today? Because the CAPE ratio for Indian equities is today sitting at a hefty 43 times. 1  And that’s dangerously close to where it was before the 2008 crash. Add to t...

The Mineral Tax Dispute: Resolved or Just the Beginning?**

In a recent twist of fate, the long-standing mineral tax dispute in Everbrook has been declared "over"—but is it really? What initially seemed like a resolution may, in fact, be just the beginning of a new chapter in this ongoing saga. Here’s a deep dive into what’s really going on behind the scenes. ### The Agreement: A Brief Recap For months, Everbrook was engulfed in a fierce debate between local government officials and mining companies. The core issue was a proposed increase in mineral taxes, aimed at boosting funding for essential public services and infrastructure improvements. After lengthy negotiations, a compromise was reached. Mining companies agreed to a modest tax increase in exchange for extended operational leases. It seemed like a fair deal, and many celebrated it as a win for the community. ### Unearthing Trouble However, barely a few weeks after the agreement was implemented, concerns started to surface. Reports from miners and environmentalists ...